Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Shackelford

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division

April 12, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
ANTWAN SHACKELFORD, Defendant.

          REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge

         On March 25, and April 8, 2019, the Court held hearings on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on February 28, 2019. Defendant Shackelford appeared in person with his appointed counsel Dominic Martin. The government appeared by Nicholas Linder, Assistant United States Attorney. U.S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Chris Dougherty.

         The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

         1. The Court advised Defendant Shackelford of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Shackleford orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

         2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Shackelford admitted violation number 3 in part. [Docket No. 377.]

         3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

Violation NumberNature of Noncompliance
3 “The defendant shall participate in a substance abuse treatment program, which may include up to eight drug tests per month.”
Antwan Shackelford submitted six positive screens for marijuana on the following dates: March 11, 2018; September 25, 2018; October 3, 2018; October 11, 2018; October 19, 2018; and November 2, 2018. He submitted four dilute screens on the following dates: June 24, 2018; June 27, 2018; July 16, 2018; and July 26, 2018.

         4. The defendant admitted to two positive drug screens on March 11, 2018, and September 25, 2018. The court accepted the admission.

         5. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation.
(b) Defendant's criminal history category is VI.
(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 8 to 14 ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.