United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BAKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
January 10, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition
for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed
on May 30, 2018. Defendant Williams appeared in person with
his appointed counsel William Dazey. The government appeared
by Barry Glickman, Assistant United States Attorney. U.S.
Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Jason Phillips.
Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with
Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:
Court advised Defendant Williams of his rights and provided
him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Williams orally
waived his right to a preliminary hearing.
After being placed under oath, Defendant Williams admitted
violation 1, and 2. [Docket No. 4.]
allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth
in the petition, are:
Nature of Noncompliance
“The defendant report to the
probation officer as directed by the court or
Mr. Williams failed to report to the probation
office on May 7, and 18, 2018. In addition,
multiple attempts to reach the offender at home and
via telephonic means have failed. The offender has
not been in contact witht his officer since April
19, 2018, and his current whereabouts is unknown.
“The defendant shall work regularly
at a lawful occupation unless excused by the
probation officer for schooling, vocational
training, or other acceptable
The offender has failed to provide verification to
the probation officer that he is lawfully employed
or actively seeking lawful employment.
parties stipulated that:
(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation.
(b) Defendant's criminal history category is VI.
(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of
supervised release, therefore, is 8 to 14 months'
Government recommended a sentence of sixty (60) days
incarceration with three (3) years of supervised release
including up to one hundred and eighty (180) days of GPS
monitoring and home detention. Defendant recommended three
(3) years of supervised release including up to one hundred
and eighty (180) days of GPS monitoring and home detention.
The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the
record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in
the petition, that his supervised release should be revoked,
and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the
Attorney General or his designee for a period of sixty (60)
days with three (3) years of supervised release to follow. In
addition to the mandatory conditions of supervision, the
following conditions of supervised release will be imposed:
1. You shall report to the probation office in the judicial
district to which you are released within 72 hours of release
from the custody of the Bureau of ...