Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Woodson

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division

January 14, 2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
BRUSHAWN WOODSON, Defendant.

          REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge

         On December 20, 2018, and January 10, 2019, the Court held hearings on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on November 19, 2018. Defendant appeared in person with his appointed counsel William Dazey. The government appeared by Peter Blackett, Assistant United States Attorney, and Amanda Kester, Assistant United States Attorney. U.S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Mark McCleese.

         The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Woodson of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Woodson orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.
2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Woodson admitted violation 3. [Docket No. 99.]
3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

         Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

         3 “You shall maintain lawful full time employment, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, vocational training, or other reasons that prevent lawful employment.” Mr. Woodson has been unemployed since August 21, 2 018. He obtained employment on July 2, 2018, while residing at the Volunteers of America. Prior to that date, he had been unemployed since beginning supervision on July 20, 2017.

         4. The government moved to dismiss violations 1, and 2 and the same granted.

         5. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation.
(b) Defendant's criminal history category is I.
(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 3 to 9 months' imprisonment.

         6. Parties jointly recommended a sentence of six (6) months with one (1) year ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.