United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Baker United States Magistrate Judge
December 20, 2018, and January 10, 2019, the Court held
hearings on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender
Under Supervision filed on November 19, 2018. Defendant
appeared in person with his appointed counsel William Dazey.
The government appeared by Peter Blackett, Assistant United
States Attorney, and Amanda Kester, Assistant United States
Attorney. U.S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Mark
Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with
Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:
1. The Court advised Defendant Woodson of his rights and
provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Woodson
orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.
2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Woodson admitted
violation 3. [Docket No. 99.]
3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set
forth in the petition, are:
Number Nature of Noncompliance
“You shall maintain lawful full time
employment, unless excused by the probation
officer for schooling, vocational training, or other reasons
that prevent lawful employment.” Mr. Woodson
has been unemployed since August 21, 2 018. He obtained
employment on July 2, 2018, while residing at the Volunteers
of America. Prior to that date, he had been unemployed since
beginning supervision on July 20, 2017.
government moved to dismiss violations 1, and 2 and the same
parties stipulated that:
(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation.
(b) Defendant's criminal history category is I.
(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of
supervised release, therefore, is 3 to 9 months'
Parties jointly recommended a sentence of six (6) months with
one (1) year ...