United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Baker United States Magistrate Judge.
August 15, 2018, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for
Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on
July 23, 2018. Defendant Nolan appeared in person with her
appointed counsel Dominic Martin. The government appeared by
Lindsay Karwoski, Assistant United States Attorney. U.S.
Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Felecia White.
Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with
Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:
Court advised Defendant Nolan of his rights and provided her
with a copy of the petition. Defendant Nolan orally waived
her right to a preliminary hearing.
After being placed under oath, Defendant Nolan admitted
violations 2, 3, 4, and 5. [Docket No. 9.]
allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth
in the petition, are:
Nature of Noncompliance
“You must refrain from any unlawful use
of a controlled substance.”
As previously reported to the court, the offender
provided urine samples on April 27, 2018, and June
13, 2018, both which yielded positive for marijuana.
The offender admitted she used marijuana.
“You shall be monitored by location
monitoring for a period of 90 days, to commence as
soon as practical, and shall abide by all technology
requirements. Offender may be restricted to her
residence at all times except for employment,
education, religious services, medical substance
abuse or mental health treatment, attorney visits,
court-ordered obligations, or other activities as
pre-approved by the probation officer.
The offender has left her residence without approval
and has been unauthorized areas on at least four
“You shall abide by a curfew on a home
The offender was arrested after her curfew hours on
the date of April 22, 2918, in Boone County, Indiana.
“You must not knowingly leave the
federal judicial district where you are authorized to
reside without first getting permission of the court
or probation officer.
Between the dates of April 20, 2018, and April 22,
2018, the offender left the judicial district and the
state, without prior approval from the probation
Government moved to dismiss violation 1 and the same granted.
parties stipulated that:
(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation.
(b) Defendant's criminal history category is I.
(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of
supervised release, therefore, is 4 to 10 months'
parties jointly recommended a modification to include
residing at the Volunteers of America for up to ninety (90)
Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record,
finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the