United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division
ENTRY DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
WALTON PRATT, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.
. . . have an independent obligation to determine whether
subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a
challenge from any party.” Arbaugh v. Y&H
Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006). “District judges
have ample authority to dismiss frivolous or transparently
defective suits spontaneously, and thus save everyone time
and legal expense. This is so even when the plaintiff has
paid all fees for filing and service.” Hoskins v.
Poelstra, 320 F.3d 761, 762 (7th Cir. 2003). For the
reasons explained below, there is a complete absence of a
plausible federal claim alleged in the amended complaint and
“[t]he Supreme Court has frequently said that a suit
which is frivolous does not invoke the jurisdiction of the
federal courts. . . .” Crowley Cutlery Company v.
United States, 849 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1988).
Brenda Parker filed this civil action against the Attorneys
James J. Morrissey and Anna-Katrina Saranti Christakis and
John Doe Managers and Officers. She was granted leave to
proceed in forma pauperis.
Parker alleges that the defendants entered into a civil
conspiracy in the State of Indiana and conspired to commit
crimes against the Courts in the State of Indiana. She claims
that thru a civil conspiracy she was willfully deprived of
her Constitutional Rights and impartial treatment in a court
of law. The defendant attorneys are residents of Cook County,
Illinois. The unnamed defendants are employees of Capital
Parker explains that the violations occurred after she filed
a civil action in Marion County Superior Court in
Indianapolis, Indiana, on January 22, 2016. That case was
assigned case number 49D10-1601-CT-002531. The exhibits
attached to the original complaint reflect that the state
court action was filed as a result of her vehicle having been
repossessed. She asserted claims for theft, fraud,
conversion, breach of the peace against several defendants.
Dkt. 1-2 at p. 2.
Amended Complaint alleges (in relevant part) that in the
course of that state court case:
14. Defendants perpetrated a fraud between all members of the
illegal enterprise by falsifying a Vehicle Sales Contract and
then filing it in a Court Action,
15. Defendants willfully and wanton of care, willingly
conspired with three Judges of Marion County Superior Courts
and lied to the Courts with the assistance of Judicial
Officers of the Court.
16. Unnamed Defendants utilized fraudulent information and
altered the information for submission into the Courts, while
knowing they were commiting a crime. See (Exh. G-J).
17. Attached evidence supports the only creditor/debtor
relationship in existence since 2007 on Parker's 2006
Ford Rxplorer was ls( Financial Services, See (P.
18. All Defendants falsified and misrepresented facts and
legal standing of a vehicle sales contract to the Courts for
Plaintiffs 2006 Ford Explorer.
28. Defendant Attorney Morrissey and Defendant Attorney
Anna-Katrina Saranti Christakis, fabricated evidence, made
false and misleading statements in a court of law that each
of them knew to be false and misleading and continued with
the fraud on the court from 2016 through February 27, 2017.
Parker's allegations reflect her belief that there was a
conspiracy or “illegal secret agreement” to
submit fraudulent documents in her state court civil action
with the purpose of depriving her of her property and rights
and achieving a favorable decision for the ...