Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McDavid v. Smith

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Terre Haute Division

June 5, 2017

KENNETH MCDAVID, Petitioner,
v.
BRIAN SMITH, Respondent.

          ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

          LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE United States District Court

         The petition of Kenneth McDavid ("McDavid") for a Writ of Habeas Corpus challenges a prison disciplinary proceeding, identified as No. ISF15-08-0151, in which he was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance. Dkt. No. 1. For the reasons explained in this Order, McDavid's habeas petition must be DENIED.

         I. OVERVIEW

         Prisoners in Indiana custody may not be deprived of good-time credits, Cochran v. Buss, 381 F.3d 637, 639 (7th Cir. 2004) (per curiam), or of credit-earning class, Montgomery v. Anderson, 262 F.3d 641, 644-45 (7th Cir. 2001), without due process. The due process requirement is satisfied with the issuance of advance written notice of the charges, a limited opportunity to present evidence to an impartial decision-maker, a written statement articulating the reasons for the disciplinary action and the evidence justifying it, and "some evidence in the record" to support the finding of guilt. Superintendent, Mass. Com. Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985). See also, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 570-71 (1974); Piggie v. Cotton, 344 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir. 2003); Webb v. Anderson, 224 F.3d 649, 652 (7th Cir. 2000).

         II. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

         On July 31, 2015, Sergeant C. Harder ("Sergeant Harder") wrote a Report of Conduct (the "Conduct Report"), charging McDavid with possession of a controlled substance. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. A. The Conduct Report states:

On 7/31/2015 at approx. 1500 hrs, I Sgt. C. Harder entered 11 North and began a strip on offender Kenneth McDavid #943202 in the A side latrine. During the search, I ordered offender McDavid to remove his socks. When McDavid removed his left sock, I clearly observed a small object wrapped in plastic, leave McDavid's sock and land on the ground directly in front of me. I picked the object up and could see the item was orange film like substance inside the plastic. I took the item to the shift office to photograph the item and found there to be two small square shaped articles, both orange colored film like substances within the plastic. The items were photographed and forwarded to Internal Affairs. Offender McDavid was identified by state ID.

Id. After being photographed, the items described in the Conduct Report were taken into evidence. Dkt. No. 11, Exs. B-D.

         McDavid was notified of the charge on August 7, 2015, when he received the Conduct Report and Notice of Disciplinary Hearing (Screening Report). Dkt. No. 11, Exs. A & E. McDavid plead not guilty to the charge. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. E. He indicated that he wished to call Offenders M. Patton and H. Arhelger as witnesses. Id. McDavid also requested that a video of the incident, which he claims will show that he "did not have socks on" in contrast to the Conduct Report, be considered as physical evidence. Id. Offender Wilbanks, in the place of Offender Patton, and Offender Arhelger each submitted statements in support of McDavid. Dkt. No. 11, Exs. F-G. Offender Carico also offered a statement supporting McDavid's position. Dkt. No. 11, Exs. J-K.

         On August 10, 2015, the Disciplinary Hearing Board reviewed the video from the date, time, and place of the incident. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. I. The hearing officer determined that McDavid would not be permitted to view the video because that would jeopardize the security of the facility. Id. However, a statement from disciplinary officer Tomaw indicated that the video depicted McDavid and Sergeant Harder in the latrine but noted that "due to the angle it is unclear as to what transpires in the latrine." Id.

         The hearing officer conducted a disciplinary hearing on August 11, 2015. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. L. At the hearing, McDavid stated that he "[g]ot a write up on pants, Told IA. [sic] about that me and Sgt. Harder having trouble. Sgt. Harder started to mess with me." Id. The hearing officer found McDavid guilty of possession of a controlled substance. Id. In making this determination, the hearing officer considered staff reports, McDavid's statement, evidence from witnesses, and additional evidence. Id. The hearing officer recommended and imposed sanctions in the form of a written reprimand, loss of phone privileges, a sixty-day deprivation of earned credit time, and a suspended credit class demotion. Id.

         On August 23, 2015, McDavid appealed to the Facility Head, who denied the appeal on September 9, 2015. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. M. McDavid appealed to the Final Reviewing Authority, who denied his appeal on January 11, 2016. Dkt. No. 11, Ex. N. McDavid finally brought this petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254, on June 1, 2016.

         III. ANALYSIS

         In his petition, McDavid argues that the evidence did not support the hearing officer's guilty determination in this case because the video evidence was unclear and because three witnesses presented ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.