Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Denny v. Knight

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division

January 25, 2017

TYRONE DENNY IYC 16-04-0006, Petitioner,
v.
STAN KNIGHT, Respondent.

          ENTRY DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

          LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE

         The petition of Tyrone Denny for a writ of habeas corpus challenges a prison disciplinary proceeding in IYC 16-04-0006. For the reasons explained in this entry, Mr. Denny's habeas petition must be denied.

         A. Overview

         Prisoners in Indiana custody may not be deprived of credit time without due process. Cochran v. Buss, 381 F.3d 637, 639 (7th Cir. 2004). The due process requirement is satisfied with the issuance of advance written notice of the charges, a limited opportunity to present evidence to an impartial decision maker, a written statement articulating the reasons for the disciplinary action and the evidence justifying it, and “some evidence in the record” to support the finding of guilt. Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454 (1985); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 570-71 (1974); Piggie v. Cotton, 344 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir. 2003); Webb v. Anderson, 224 F.3d 649, 652 (7th Cir. 2000). A violation of state law will not support the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Holman v. Gilmore, 126 F.3d 876, 884 (7th Cir. 1997).

         B. The Disciplinary Proceeding

         On March 25, 2016, Investigator P. Prulheire wrote a Report of Conduct charging Mr. Denny with unauthorized possession of personal information. The conduct report states:

Use of a Global Tel Link phone pin number or a J-pay password by another offender who is not the owner of the pin number or password, is considered unauthorized possession or use of property of value belonging to another offender. Any offender who provides their personal Global Tel Link phone pin number to another offender, or allows another offender to use those assets under his user credentials, is in violation and is considered to be aiding in unauthorized possession of property of value belonging to another offender. Failure by the owner to protect the security of their credentials is not a defense in conduct violations. The below information shows a detected violation of these standards and lists the system affected, the area, date and time of the detection as well as the asset owner and unauthorized user information.
System used in violation: Global Tel Link
Date of offense: March 4, 2016
Date of Discovery: March 25, 2016
Time of Offense: approx. 4:39 pm
Name and DOC of Offender who used unauthorized PIN or Password:
Tyrone Denny 160500
Account Name/Account Number or Phone Number: 718-300-0240 Area of Offense: K2 Rec ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.