United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Evansville Division
GERMAN AMERICAN FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND TRUST COMPANY as Trustee of the Robert G. Woodward, Sr. Roth IRA, Plaintiff,
JERRY C. RIGSBY, MARY F. RIGSBY, defaulted 10/23/2014, Defendants.
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff, German American Financial Advisors and Trust Company, as trustee of the Robert G. Woodward, Sr. Roth IRA ("German American"), allege that Defendants, Jerry and Mary Rigsby, defaulted on a promissory note. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment arguing that there is no dispute of fact that the promissory note came due and was not paid. Defendants did not respond. For the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion.
On June 29, 2009, the Rigsbys entered into a Promissory Note ("Note") with Wachovia Bank, Trustee of the Robert Woodward, Sr. Roth IRA for the principal amount of $200, 000.00. (Promissory Note, Complaint Exhibit A). Wachovia assigned the Note to German American on June 11, 2012, which accepted it on June 19, 2012. (Assignment and Acceptance Exhibits, Complaint Exhibits B and C). The Note matured on June 22, 2014, with the principal amount due that day. To date, the Rigsbys have not paid the amount owed.
The purpose of summary judgment is to "pierce the pleadings and to assess the proof in order to see whether there is a genuine need for trial." Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986). Summary judgment is appropriate if the record "shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed R. Civ. P. 56(a). A genuine issue of material fact exists if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict in favor of the non-moving party on the particular issue. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986).
Before discussing the merits of the lawsuit, the court must first consider what effect the clerk's entry of default against Mary Rigsby has on the present motion. The court will then consider the merits and what damages to award.
A. Default against Mary Rigsby
The clerk entered default against Mary Rigsby on October 23, 2014. Nevertheless, the court may enter summary judgment against her because German American has not yet applied to the court for default judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2).
B. Default on the Note
Pursuant to the Note, the Rigsbys were to pay the outstanding principal and any interest and penalties on June 22, 2014. (Exhibit A). Default occurs when the borrower fails to make any payment under the Note when due. Because the Rigsbys failed to make the $200, 000.00 payment upon maturation of the Note, they have defaulted under the Note. Thus, German American is entitled to judgment in its favor.
C. Damages and Attorneys' Fees and Costs
Pursuant to the Note, the Rigsbys now owe the principal of $200, 000.00, a late charge of $10, 000.00, and default interest in the amount of $82.19 per day computed at 15% per annum. The Rigsbys also owe attorneys' fees. German American is seeking those damages in this action and $13, 853.69 in attorneys' fees. The court finds that German American is entitled to $210, 000.00 under the note, plus post-judgment interest. However, the court will only award attorneys' fees in the amount of $4, 403.60 at this time. The remaining $9, 450.00 is an estimate provided by plaintiff's counsel. (James ...