Travis J. Monroe, Appellant-Defendant,
State of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
These opinions are not precedents and cannot be cited or relied upon unless used when establishing res judicata or collateral estoppel or in actions between the same party. Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure 65(D).
Appeal from the Bartholomew Superior Court. The Honorable Kathleen Tighe Coriden, Judge. Cause No. 03D02-1212-CM-6450.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: J. Grant Tucker, Jones Patterson & Tucker, Columbus, Indiana.
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana; Jesse R. Drum, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Baker, Judge. Vaidik, C.J., and Riley, J., concur.
[¶1] Travis Monroe appeals his conviction for Possession of Paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. Finding sufficient evidence, we affirm.
[¶2] On November 30, 2012, Monroe was a passenger in James Rush's truck. Bartholomew County Sheriff's Officer Kraig Weisner (Officer Kraig) stopped Rush for speeding and failing to signal while changing lanes. Rush was driving with a suspended license and was arrested for driving while intoxicated.
[¶3] Officer Kraig asked Monroe to exit the truck, and, when he did so, the officer noticed a corncob pipe on the floorboard of the vehicle where Monroe's feet had been. Officer Kraig noticed that the pipe smelt of burnt marijuana. At this point, Officer Kris Weisner (Officer Kris) had arrived at the scene to assist with the traffic stop. Officer Kraig gave him the pipe to field test; it tested positive for marijuana. Officer Kraig testified at trial that he then asked Monroe who the pipe belonged to and that Monroe stated that it was his. He then asked Monroe what was in the pipe; Monroe told him it was tobacco. Officer Kraig testified that when he asked him what type of tobacco, to which Monroe responded, " you know what type it is, something to that affect." Tr. p. 8.
[¶4] On December 18, 2012, the State charged Monroe with class A misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia. Monroe's bench trial took place on July 2, 2014, and the trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to one year in the Bartholomew County Jail, suspended to probation. Monroe now appeals.
Discussion and Decision
[¶5] Monroe argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for possession of paraphernalia. When reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not reweigh the evidence or judge the credibility of the witnesses. Bond v. State, 925 N.E.2d 773, 781 (Ind.Ct.App. 2010). Rather, we consider only the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and we will affirm if the evidence and those inferences constitute substantial evidence of probative value to support the verdict. Id. Reversal is ...