Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Comer v. Gramaglia

United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division

August 22, 2014

JOSHUA EMMANNUAL COMER, Plaintiff,
v.
GUY GRAMAGLIA Lieutenant, JERRY KINNETT Deputy Sheriff, Defendants.

ENTRY DIRECTING DEVELOPMENT OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE REGARDING ASSERTED FAILURE TO EXHAUST AVAILABLE ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

HON. TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE

The defendants have asserted the affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit. This defense must be resolved before reaching the merits of this case. Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739, 742 (7th Cir. 2008); Perez v. Wis. Dep't of Corr., 182 F.3d 532, 536 (7th Cir. 1999) (“The statute [requiring administrative exhaustion] can function properly only if the judge resolves disputes about its application before turning to any other issue in the suit.”). Accordingly, the defendants shall have through September 30, 2014, in which to either 1) file a dispositive motion in support of the affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit, 2) notify the court that this affirmative defense is not amenable to resolution through a dispositive motion, or 3) notify the court that the defendant will not pursue the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust. If a dispositive motion is filed, the plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond. The defendants shall then have fifteen (15) days in which to reply.

All other proceedings and deadlines are stayed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.