United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division
May 22, 2014
KIMBERLY BLEDSOE, Plaintiff,
COMBINED INSURANCE CO., ROSS TAYLOR, LYNETTE YEPSON, Defendants.
PENDING MOTIONS AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs [dkt. 2] is granted.
The plaintiff's motion requesting service of process [dkt. 4] is granted consistent with the following. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry.
The plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel [dkt. 5] has been considered. In support, the plaintiff states that she has "contacted 15-20 attorneys and all have said no and I have a very limited income." Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), courts are empowered only to "request" counsel. Mallard v. United States District Court, 490 U.S. 296, 300 (1989). "When confronted with a request... for pro bono counsel, the district court is to make the following inquiries: (1) has the indigent plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so; and if so, (2) given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself?" Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-655 (7th Cir. 2007).
Although the Court concludes, that the plaintiff has made a reasonable effort to secure representation, she should continue her own effort. The court proceeds to the second inquiry required in these circumstances. The court's task in this second inquiry is to analyze the plaintiff's abilities as related to "the tasks that normally attend litigation: evidence gathering, preparing and responding to motions and other court filings, and trial." Pruitt, 503 F.3d at 655. Accordingly, the question is not whether an attorney would help the plaintiff's case, but whether, given the difficulty of the case, the plaintiff seems competent to litigate it herself. Id. at 653-655. At this point, the plaintiff appears competent to litigate this action on her own no basis for concluding otherwise has been suggested by the plaintiff. In addition, "until the defendants respond to the complaint, the plaintiff's need for assistance of counsel... cannot be gauged." Kadamovas v. Stevens, 706 F.3d 843, 845 (7th Cir. 2013). Under these circumstances, the plaintiff's request for counsel [dkt. 5] is denied without prejudice as premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.