Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Panwar v. Access Therapies, Inc
United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division
March 3, 2014
RITURAJ SINGH PANWAR on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
ACCESS THERAPIES, INC, RN STAFF INC doing business as REHABILITY CARE, RAMON VILLEGAS, Defendants.
ADOPTION
Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court
The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs motions for Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 sanctions and attorney’s fees and Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees. Parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and no objections having been filed, approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 sanctions [Docket Nos. 97, 114] is granted to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, but Plaintiffs request for a judgment or an adverse inference is denied. Defendants’ motion to strike ...